Sunday, November 25, 2012

Root of Our Governance Problem


The Root of our "Omnibus" problem -nescience of the 1947 Letters Patent, the 1867 Reservation/Disallowance Powers et al

Robert Ede <robertede@gmail.com>Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 8:21 AM

To: YCYC-VCVC <contact@ycyc-vcvc.ca>, ConstitutionalMonarchy Watch <dwatch@web.net>, "Your Canada, Your Constitution / Votre Canada. Votre Constitution" <info@ycyc-vcvc.ca>
Cc: op-ed star <oped@thestar.ca>, "Letters (National Post)" <op-ed@nationalpost.com>, oped@thegazette.canwest.com, hill times <kmalloy@hilltimes.com>, The Tyee <editor@thetyee.ca>, Fred Ryan -West Quebec Post <abawqp@videotron.ca>, Jamie Gilcig <canvid@gmail.com>
 


Dear Mr Duff Conacher,
cc Various editors
cc Canada

Re: Your question "Should omnibus bills be banned so politicians are not forced to vote on various unrelated bills all at the same time?"


All of your campaign's concerns (the audacity and arrogance of majority PM's) could be addressed by a public review of the Letters Patent 1947. 

The BNA/Constitution lays out (and the Letters Patent confirms and expands) the powers (and superiority/independence) of the Executive Power (ss.9-16) vested in the Monarch and Governor General.

The power to withhold Assent (+plus disallow and reserve it) plus the terms of ss.12-13 clearly establishes the role of "Benevolent Autocrat/ Arbitrator" in the Office of our Governor General.

No law prevents the GovGen from exercising these powers (or s.90, the Lt Gov provincially + ss.58-68).

The only reason Canadians do NOT enjoy the protection of a "Benevolent Autocrat/Arbitrator" on BOTH these levels of governance is the appointment process since Wm L M King's days - normal Canadian folks are elevated to vice-regal status and subsequently deign/dare not bite the hand that "brung" them (sorry to mix metaphors).

If the GovGen (Lt Gen's) were elected at-large there would be no question about their mandate and their responsibilities - as a further check/balance on the activities of the Legislative power (esp a majority).

Further, an public examination of the "legality" of the post-WW2 continuance of Order in Council PC 1940-1121 (the wartime merger of the non-political office of Clerk of the Privy Council with the all-political Office of Secretary to the Cabinet prompted by the urgency to co-ordinate the mobilization of all of Canada's resources to save Great Britain) ?could? lead to the rescission of that temporary, emergency Order and ?could? lead to the restoration of the complete 4-level hierarchy of check/balance powers outlined in the amazingly prescient BNA Act 1867.

see link to PC 1940-1121


Digression and mind-jolter - Have you ever wondered why Canada never calls on the best-educated, most-experienced, longest-serving, fully life-tested, most well-connected individual in the World for advice?

To me, this oversight/neglect is particularly odd, when your consider that Her Majesty the Queen is already established as the 4th (and ultimate) check/balance in Canada's hierarchical power-sharing arrangement referenced above?


In my view, until we return to the 'as-written' provisions of our foundation law, we have no valid constitution, no consistent body of laws, no responsible parliament and no hope of legislative justice, honour, truth or accountability.

I submit that to continue to ignore this hidden-right-under-our-noses truth only proves we collectively have no knowledge of the facts AND/OR no innate will to govern ourselves, no inherent awareness of the need to be eternally vigilant and no idea that this superbly located, magnificently abundant (built of yellow and black gold) country can collectively belong to us ... if we make the effort to cast off our "benign neglect".

Until we restore Canada's original and still perfectly-suited hierarchical power-sharing framework, seizing it back from the "machinery of government" that has usurped all the legislative and executive power and placed the resident/taxpayer/citizens in the role of tenant-farmer/ indentured servant/ feudal serf/ cannon fodder blindly following edicts from on high ... we will prosper no further as individuals, as families, as a people, as a nation-of-nations united as one country, as a middle-power fighting above-its-weight-class ... we will only dwindle. 

"... Not with a bang, but a whimper." (T.S Eliot)


Rce 

"There is no shame in turning back, when you discover you're on the wrong path" 



 
Robert Ede,
Spokesman,
The Majority of Canadians P.A.C.,
 
 

"All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860)

Saturday, November 10, 2012

China has its OWN OIl Sands -- Junggar (Dzungarian) Basin in the northwestern region of Xinjiang

BUT, not the technology to extract it efficiently

What better way to spend their US$ holdings (before it gets devalued even further)




Excerpt from

Nexen deal sheds light on China's oilsands strategy - Reuters


A total of 1.6 billion barrels had been found in four natural bitumen accumulations in Junggar (Dzungarian) Basin in the northwestern region of Xinjiang as of the end of 2008, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

It also says China has 8.9 billion barrels of extra-heavy oil resource and substantial amounts of shale oil.

China will speed up development of its abundant shale oil resources and is considering launching some pilot projects, Liu Tienan, head of China's National Energy Administration, told state media earlier this month.

Liu added that China has recoverable shale oil resources of 10 billion tonnes.

Beijing has not set any domestic output goal for oil sands, heavy oil or shale oil in any of its five-year economic development plans even though it has set targets for shale gas and other cleaner unconventional resources in its 12th five-year plan for 2011-2015.

"Because of technology and cost constraints, China cannot develop all kinds of unconventional resources at home in one go," said an energy researcher with China's powerful economic planner, the National Development and Reform Commission. He requested anonymity as he was not authorised to speak to foreign media.

Despite the lack of a national target, an MLR research arm expects China to produce 500,000 tonnes of oil sands in 2015 (8,630 bpd), one million tonnes a year in 2020, and five million tonnes in 2030.

State oil firms now lack the incentives to make a headlong rush into domestic oil sands when more abundant and commercially viable bitumen reserves are available in Canada, analysts say.

The only oil sands project in China that has made some progress is PetroChina's Karamay project in the Junggar Basin. It is expected to produce oil in October and have an annual capacity of 100,000-200,000 tonnes by the end of 2012 and one million tonnes by the end of next year, Chinese media say.

Karamay started oil sands development on a trial basis around 2008, but it was suspended later as PetroChina balked at the high cost and lack of economies of scale, a MLR source said.

"Now our country is paying attention to unconventional resources, so PetroChina resumed its oil sands experiment in Karamay. It needs to find the right technology for the project," he told Reuters.


Junggar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzungaria) Basin in the northwestern region of Xinjiang

Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences